OSINT Analytics · Supply Line Quantification · Threat Assessment

TRACE — Trafficking Route Assessment & Corridor Evaluation

Five Golden Crescent opiate corridors scored and ranked using UNODC, EUDA, and ACLED data. Adjust indicator weights, model route disruptions, or switch to Sahel arms trafficking. All scores 0-100 with full source attribution.

Live Scores

Threat Dashboard

How to Use This Tool

Step 1
Choose a mode (TRACE-N for narco or TRACE-A for arms) and configure indicator weights below.
Step 2
Add routes with observed OSINT indicator values and optional Route Importance Factor data.
Step 3
Review ranked scores, compare routes visually, and analyze weight sensitivity.
Step 4
Export your analysis or adjust weights to see how rankings shift.
Routes Analyzed
0
Highest Score
--
Average Score
--
Threat Spread
--
Std Deviation
Route Comparison

Add routes below to see comparison visualization

Score Distribution
Weight Allocation
Geospatial Overlay
Configuration

Indicator Weights

Adjust the relative importance of each indicator. Weights are automatically normalized to sum to 1.0.

TRACE-N Indicator Weights
Total: 1.00
RIF Weights (Route Importance Factor)
Total: 1.00
Data Input

Supply Routes

Add trafficking routes with observed indicator values. Each route is scored independently and ranked.

Analytical Tool: TRACE quantifies supply route significance using weighted, normalized OSINT indicators. Input values should be sourced from law enforcement reports, intelligence assessments, and open-source data.
Add New Route
Core Indicators
Route Importance Factor (RIF)
Route Rankings
Rank Route Region Period Base (0-100) RIF (0-100) Final (0-100) Severity Actions
No routes added yet
Analysis

Weight Sensitivity

See how route rankings change when individual indicator weights are increased by 50%. Highlights which indicators have the most influence on final scores.

Sensitivity Matrix
Route
Add at least 2 routes to see sensitivity analysis
Rank Stability
Strategic View

Risk Matrix

Scatter plot of base threat score vs. route importance. Quadrant position determines operational priority.

Threat Score vs. Route Importance
Add routes with RIF data to see the risk matrix
Scenario Planning

Disruption Simulator

Model the impact of disrupting a route. When a route is taken offline, its traffic redistributes to connected routes proportionally. See which routes absorb the most pressure.

Disrupt a Route
Capacity Reduction 100%
100% = full takedown. Lower values model partial interdiction.
Redistribution Impact
Select a route above to model disruption
Output

Executive Briefing

Auto-generated analytical summary from current data. Preview below, export via email.

Generated Briefing

Add routes and data to generate an executive briefing

Your analysis is ready.

Enter your email to receive the full executive briefing with route rankings, severity classifications, and methodology documentation.

Need this applied to your region?

Commission a full threat assessment with custom indicator sets, proprietary data integration, calibrated weights from field expertise, and analyst-written recommendations. Available for government agencies, think tanks, NGOs, and research institutions.

Commission Analysis →
Provenance

Source Attribution

Sample datasets are derived from the following authoritative open-source publications. All figures are unclassified OSINT.

Drug Trafficking Sources

UNODC World Drug Report 2024/2025 — Global seizure volumes, production estimates, market values

UNODC Balkan Route Report (2025) — 9.6t pure heroin equivalent to EU, $20B annual market value

UNODC Northern Route Report (2018) — $13B market, 80t heroin + 15t opium through Tajikistan

UNODC Afghan Opium Survey 2023/2025 — 296t production, price data ($570-750/kg opium)

EUDA EU Drug Markets: Heroin (2024) — 9.5t EU seizures (2021 peak), EUR 5.2B retail market

FATF Financial Flows — Afghan opiate financial networks

Arms Trafficking Sources

Conflict Armament Research (2023) — 700+ weapons investigated in Sahel, diversion analysis

UNODC TOCTA Sahel: Firearms (2023) — 12M illicit arms in West Africa, 105% seizure increase

Small Arms Survey (2023-2024) — Afghan/Pakistan weapon pricing, cross-border dynamics

GI-TOC Organized Crime Index (2021/2023) — Libya 9.5/10, Syria/Iraq 9/10, Pakistan 8.5/10

UN Panel of Experts on Libya (2023) — 12,000 pistols seized, embargo violations

ACLED Armed Conflict Data — Geo-referenced incident counts by province/region

Analytical Caveats: Seizure data represents only 5-20% of actual trafficking volumes (UNODC est.). Technological Sophistication and Strategic Value are analyst assessments on 1-10 scales derived from qualitative source descriptions. Violence incident counts cover geographic areas, not exclusively trafficking-related events. Economic impact mixes seizure value and market estimates depending on source availability.
Documentation

Methodology

TRACE-N quantifies the significance of narco-trafficking supply routes by aggregating weighted, min-max normalized OSINT indicators into a composite score on a 0-100 scale.

Step 1 — Normalize each indicator to 0-100: I_norm = (I_raw - I_min) / (I_max - I_min) × 100 Step 2 — Compute weighted base score (0-100): Base = Σ (W_i × I_norm_i) where Σ W_i = 1.0 Step 3 — Compute RIF score (0-100, same normalization): RIF = Σ (W_j × RIF_norm_j) Step 4 — Final score via geometric mean (0-100): Final = √(Base × RIF)

Why min-max normalization? Raw indicator values span incompatible scales (kg, USD, counts, 1-10). Without normalization, whichever indicator has the largest absolute values dominates the score regardless of weight. Min-max normalization (standard in UNDP HDI, Global Peace Index, Fragile States Index) rescales each to 0-100 within the dataset, ensuring weights operate as intended.

Why geometric mean? Arithmetic mean allows a high base score to compensate for low route importance. The geometric mean penalizes imbalance — a route must score well on both dimensions to rank highly. This better reflects operational reality where even a high-volume route matters less if it has low strategic significance.

Indicators

IndicatorAbbrevUnitDefault Weight
Volume of Seized DrugsVSDkg0.25
Number of ArrestsNARcount0.15
Freq. of Identified RoutesFITRcount0.20
Technological SophisticationTS1-10 scale0.10
Economic ImpactEIUSD0.20
Violence & Crime RateVCRincidents0.10

TRACE-A applies the same normalized weighted-sum methodology to quantify arms trafficking activities. Scoring follows the identical 4-step process: min-max normalization, weighted base score, RIF computation, and geometric mean combination. All scores output on a 0-100 scale.

Indicators

IndicatorAbbrevUnitDefault Weight
Volume of Seized ArmsVSAweapons0.30
Number of ArrestsNARATcount0.20
Freq. of Identified RoutesFITRcount0.15
Technological SophisticationTS1-10 scale0.10
Economic ImpactEIUSD0.15
Violence & Crime RateVCRincidents0.10

The RIF is a multiplier that adjusts the base index score by the strategic importance of the specific route.

RIF_route = Σ (W_j × I_j) Where: W_j = Weight assigned to RIF indicator j I_j = Measured value of RIF indicator j

RIF Indicators

IndicatorAbbrevUnitDefault Weight
Volume of TrafficVTunits0.30
Frequency of UseFUtimes/period0.30
Strategic ValueSV1-10 scale0.20
Connectivity to Other RoutesCRconnections0.20

Severity Classification

Normalized scores (0-100) are classified into severity tiers for operational prioritization:

TierNormalized ScoreInterpretation
Critical75 - 100Highest priority; active disruption recommended
High50 - 74Significant threat; enhanced monitoring required
Moderate25 - 49Notable activity; standard surveillance
Low0 - 24Minimal activity; periodic review

Technological Sophistication (TS) Scale

ScoreLevelDescription
1-3LowBasic methods, unencrypted communication, manual processes
4-6MediumSome technology use, encrypted communications, established networks
7-10HighAdvanced methods, drones, sophisticated encryption, complex logistics

Strategic Value (SV) Scale

ScoreLevelDescription
1-3LowRarely used, easily replaceable, low operational importance
4-6MediumModerately used, some strategic benefits, regional significance
7-10HighFrequently used, critical for operations, high strategic value

Data Sources

All indicators are derived from Open Source Intelligence (OSINT):

Source TypeExamples
Law EnforcementSeizure reports, arrest records, intelligence bulletins
News & MediaInvestigative journalism, incident reporting, conflict monitoring
Financial IntelligenceAsset seizure records, sanctions data, financial disclosures
GeospatialSatellite imagery, route mapping, border crossing data
AcademicResearch papers, think tank reports, policy analyses